OJPHI: Vol. 5
Journal Information
Journal ID (publisher-id): OJPHI
ISSN: 1947-2579
Publisher: University of Illinois at Chicago Library
Article Information
©2013 the author(s)
open-access: This is an Open Access article. Authors own copyright of their articles appearing in the Online Journal of Public Health Informatics. Readers may copy articles without permission of the copyright owner(s), as long as the author and OJPHI are acknowledged in the copy and the copy is used for educational, not-for-profit purposes.
Electronic publication date: Day: 4 Month: 4 Year: 2013
collection publication date: Year: 2013
Volume: 5E-location ID: e102
Publisher Id: ojphi-05-102

Comparing Syndromic Surveillance and Poison Center Data for Snake Bites in Missouri
Karen H. Pugh*1
Amy Kelsey2
Rebecca Tominack31
1St. Louis University School of Medicine and School of Public Health, Saint Louis, MO, USA;
2Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, Jefferson City, MO, USA;
3Missouri Poison Center, Saint Louis, MO, USA
*Karen H. Pugh, E-mail: khill9@slu.edu

Abstract
Objective

This study intends to use two different surveillance systems available in Missouri to explore snake bite frequency and geographic distribution.

Introduction

In 2010, there were 4,796 snake bite exposures reported to Poison Centers nationwide (1). Health care providers frequently request help from poison centers regarding snake envenomations due to the unpredictability and complexity of prognosis and treatment. The Missouri Poison Center (MoPC) maintains a surveillance database keeping track of every phone call received. ESSENCE, a syndromic surveillance system used in Missouri, enables surveillance by chief complaint of 84 different emergency departments (ED) in Missouri (accounting for approximately 90% of all ED visits statewide). Since calling a poison center is voluntary for health care providers, poison center data is most likely an underestimation of the true frequency of snake envenomations. Comparing MoPC and ESSENCE data for snake envenomations would enable the MoPC to have a more accurate depiction of snake bite frequency in Missouri and to see where future outreach of poison center awareness should be focused.

Methods

Archived data from Toxicall®, the MoPC surveillance system, was used to query the total number of snake bite cases from 01/01/2007 until 12/31/2011 called into the MoPC center by hospitals that also participate ESSENCE. Next, ESSENCE data was used to estimate the total number of snake envenomations presenting to EDs in Missouri. This was accomplished using the same date range as well as searching for key terms in the chief complaints that would signify a snake bite. The results of each datasearch were compared and contrasted by Missouri region.

Results

The Toxicall® search showed a total of 324 snake bite cases. The initial ESSENCE data query showed a total of 1983 snake bite cases. After certain data exclusions, there was a total of 1763 ESSENCE snake bite visits. This suggests that approximately 18% of all snake bite visits reported in Missouri ESSENCE were called into the MoPC. The results are demonstrated by Missouri region in Figure 1. This figure also shows that the greatest number of ESSENCE visits for snake bites were reported by Southwest region hospitals whereas the Eastern region hospitals placed the greatest number of calls to MoPC regarding snake bites.

Conclusions

The total number of snake bite cases from Missouri ESSENCE ED visits is much greater than the number of snake bites cases called into the MoPC by ESSENCE participating hospitals. This underutilization of the poison center demonstrates the increased need for awareness of the MoPC’s free services. In Missouri, the MoPC should target hospitals in the Southwest region for outreach in particular based on these findings. Poison centers are staffed by individuals trained in all types of poisonings and maintain a list of consulting physicians throughout the United States experienced in management and treatment of venomous snake bites (2). Any healthcare facility would benefit from MoPC assistance. Finally, syndromic surveillance allows for quick and easy data compilation, however there are some difficulties when attempting to search for a particular condition. Communication and partnership between two different public health organizations will be beneficial toward future public health studies.


References
1.. Bronstein AC, Spyker DA, Cantilena LR, Green JL, Rumack BH, Dart RC. 2010 Annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers’ national poison data system (NPDS): 28th annual reportClinical Toxicology 2011;49:910–41.
2.. Gold BS, Barish RA, Dart RC. North American snake envenomation: diagnosis, treatment, and managementEmerg Med Clin N Am 2004;22:423–43.

Figures
ojphi-05-102f1.tif
[Figure ID: f1-ojphi-05-102]
Figure 1: 

ESSENCE Snake Bites Cases Compared to Toxicall® Snake Bite Cases in Missouri by Region



Article Categories:
  • ISDS 2012 Conference Abstracts

Keywords: ESSENCE, surveillance, Missouri, Poison Center, snake.




Online Journal of Public Health Informatics * ISSN 1947-2579 * http://ojphi.org